On Tue, Jul 03, 2012 at 10:59:03AM +0200, Hartmann, O. wrote: > On 07/02/12 08:09, Sayetsky Anton wrote: > > I will test libreoffice build on 8.3-RELEASE today or tomorrow. > > I have both gstreamer and boost installed now. > > > > > We use FreeBSD 9.0STABLE and FreeBSD 10.0-CURRENT (both amd64). > > devel/boost-lib gets reeled in now by editors/libreoffice by default, so > it doesn't need to be installed explicitely. > > I saw a patch flushed in yesterday, submitted by bapt@. This patch also > installs LLVM/CLANG from the ports - with ASSERTS deactivated. > > I have on both systems, FreeBSD 9 and 10, LLVM/CLANG 3.1 as the standard > backend compiler, I guess this version has the suspected ASSERTS activated. > > Why another LLVM port? We already have LLVM/CLANG in the base system (9 > and 19). If the ASSERTS proble is the cause for breaks reported on the > list and elsewhere on the net, why isn't the maintainer still stuck on > the "old" version? > > I just managed it to install the prior version on broken systems and was > really lucky having LibreOffice working again. But the other day I was > bothered by the next non-working version and now I have lots of > notebooks remaining with NO LibreOffice on FBSD 9-STABLE. > > This is not what I expect from quality securing! It is simply a mess and > definitely another reason and point for the thread "Why NOT using FreeBSD". > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
sure libreoffice is so easy to port... /me officially gives up with that libreoffice port, open for new volunteers bapt
pgpbzelHb1oea.pgp
Description: PGP signature
