> > Hm. But I'd think that even with modern drives a smaller number of bigger > I/Os is preferable over lots of very small I/Os. Not necessarily. It depends upon overhead costs per-i/o. With larger I/Os, you do pay in interference costs (you can't transfer data for request N because the 256Kbytes of request M is still in the pipe). To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
- Re: FreeBSD random I/O performance issues Richard Wendland
- Re: FreeBSD random I/O performance issues Richard Wendland
- Re: FreeBSD random I/O performance issues Matthew Dillon
- Re: FreeBSD random I/O performance issues Sheldon Hearn
- Re: FreeBSD random I/O performance issues Matthew Dillon
- Re: FreeBSD random I/O performance issues Chris Wasser
- Re: patches for test / review Poul-Henning Kamp
- Re: patches for test / review Greg Lehey
- Re: patches for test / review Poul-Henning Kamp
- Re: patches for test / review Wilko Bulte
- Re: patches for test / review Matthew Jacob
- Re: patches for test / review Matthew Dillon
- Re: patches for test / review Wilko Bulte
- Re: patches for test / review Matthew Dillon
- Re: patches for test / review Wilko Bulte
- Re: patches for test / review Rodney W. Grimes
- Re: patches for test / review Wilko Bulte
- Re: patches for test / review Rodney W. Grimes
- Re: patches for test / review Greg Lehey
- Re: patches for test / review Matthew Dillon
- Re: patches for test / review Alfred Perlstein