On Feb 23, 2012, at 9:16 AM, Alexander Kabaev wrote: > On Tue, 21 Feb 2012 21:11:13 -0800 > Tim Kientzle <t...@kientzle.com> wrote: > >> >> If I understand correctly, the libgcc in base is pretty stripped >> down compared to "regular" libgcc, because most of that >> stuff is in our libc instead. >> > > You understand it a bit wrong, but your conclusions are correct. libgcc > in base is not stripped in any way and is supposed to be identical to > one coming from upstream.
So where is __umodsi3 supposed to be defined for ARM? In FreeBSD, libgcc refers to it but does not define it. It's defined in libc. I stumbled across this trying to link some freestanding ARM code using the native cross-compilers. The link failed if I used -nostdlib because of a handful of symbols such as this. Tim _______________________________________________ freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
