In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Mike Smith writes: >> fxp0: The Intel driver is by far the highest preformance model, >> beats the 3com (second best) hands down with much lower CPU >> overhead. > >Do you actually have any numbers to quantify this? There's nothing in >the driver architecture nor any of my testing that would suggest this is >actually the case at this point. The FreeBSD fxp driver does a lot to reduce the number of transmit interrupts; only 1/120 of transmitted packets result in interrupts. See the code relating to FXP_CXINT_THRESH. Assuming an even balance of transmitted and received packets, this should reduce the total number of interrupts by nearly 50%. I don't know if drivers for other cards do (or even can) use this approach. Ian To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
- Re: Best NIC for FBSD (was: Buffer Problems and hangs in 4... yramin
- Re: Best NIC for FBSD (was: Buffer Problems and hangs... David O'Brien
- Re: Best NIC for FBSD (was: Buffer Problems and hangs... Mike Smith
- Re: Best NIC for FBSD (was: Buffer Problems and h... Garrett Wollman
- Re: Best NIC for FBSD (was: Buffer Problems and h... Brad Knowles
- Re: Best NIC for FBSD (was: Buffer Problems and h... Ian Dowse
- Re: Best NIC for FBSD (was: Buffer Problems and h... Martin Cracauer
- Re: Best NIC for FBSD (was: Buffer Problems and hangs... Warner Losh
- Re: Best NIC for FBSD (was: Buffer Problems and hangs... yramin
- Re: Re: Best NIC for FBSD (was: Buffer Problems and h... yramin
- Re: Re: Best NIC for FBSD (was: Buffer Problems a... David O'Brien
- Re: Re: Best NIC for FBSD (was: Buffer Problems and h... yramin
- Re: Re: Best NIC for FBSD (was: Buffer Problems and h... yramin
- Re: Re: Best NIC for FBSD (was: Buffer Problems and h... yramin
- Re: Re: Best NIC for FBSD (was: Buffer Problems and h... yramin