On Fri, 30 Sep 2011 09:52:53 +0200, "crsnet.pl" <crs...@crsnet.pl>
wrote:
On Wed, 28 Sep 2011 19:57:56 +0900, Taku YAMAMOTO
<t...@tackymt.homeip.net> wrote:
On Tue, 27 Sep 2011 13:06:21 +0100
Gavin Atkinson <gavin.atkin...@ury.york.ac.uk> wrote:
On Tue, 2011-09-27 at 19:53 +0800, Adrian Chadd wrote:
> Hans,
>
> Why haven't those patches been committed?
This patch is an absolute hack, and shouldn't be committed as it
is.
I would, however, appreciate some help in determining the correct
solution. The solution may well involve not suspending/resuming
hpet(4)
or the other timers on the normal DEVICE_SUSPEND()/DEVICE_RESUME()
path
but instead doing them as the last thing to be suspended, or it may
Like the attached patches do?
instead involve reworking the USB code (and potentially other code)
to
not need to sleep during suspend/resume. I don't know the right
solution, but would really like to work with somebody who does.
Please also see the thread "Choosing between DELAY(useconds) and
pause()" on -current.
Gavin
Hello.
After longer testing thouse patches. I must say, they dont resolve my
problem in 100%.
Suspend/Resume on short time (about 2-3 hours, meybye little longer)
works fine. But when i suspend it for longer (8-10 hours) system freeze
after resume.
Any another idea why ?
Best regards, Adrian.
_______________________________________________
freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"