on 29/05/2011 06:06 Attilio Rao said the following: > 2011/5/28 Attilio Rao <atti...@freebsd.org>: >> 2011/5/25 Andriy Gapon <a...@freebsd.org>: >>> The patch is here: >>> http://people.freebsd.org/~avg/cpu-offline-sysctl.diff >>> It should implement the strategy described above. >>> >> >> I don't see the point in keeping alive mp_grab_cpu_hlt() and >> supporting, actually. >> >> On the top of your patch I made some modifies that use directly >> ap_watchdog() in cpu_idle() which I think is better for the time >> being: >> http://www.freebsd.org/~attilio/avg_rem_cpuhlt.diff
Yes, I agree, thank you. >> If you are happy with it, just commit as long as Garrett tests that. OK. Waiting for test feedback. >> On a second round of changes we can discuss mp_watchdog and eventual >> removal / improvements to it. > > I almost forgot: this change would also require an UPDATE entry, where > you explicitly mention the "new" way to deal with CPUs. Use your > prefer wording. Sure. Thank you! BTW, I guess there would be no reason to MFC this change? -- Andriy Gapon _______________________________________________ freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
