On Wed, Jan 05, 2011 at 09:22:42PM +0100, Erik Cederstrand wrote: > > Den 05/01/2011 kl. 17.55 skrev Ulrich Sp?rlein: > > > And clang did the right thing here in the past. Beware that it does no > > inter-procedural analysis yet, so it will usually miss that usage() > > calls exit unconditionally. > > > > *But*, it should grok that for err(3) and exit(3). Now there are some > > possible remedies: > > > > - get IPA to work with clang, or at least file a bug > > I filed a bug with LLVM (http://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=8914) but it > seems IPA bugs filed on the analyzer have been rejected in the past.
I have a dumb patch that may help here... can someone test it? http://lev.vlakno.cz/~rdivacky/clang-checker-no-return.patch it may slow down the analysis a lot, if it does please add a recursion limit there... roman _______________________________________________ freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
