:On 2000-Mar-08 10:38:23 +1100, Dan Potter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
:>Has anyone thought about the problem I posted a few days ago (getcwd()
:>breaks on unionfs in some conditions)? That seems like a pretty big
:>problem to me... maybe not too many people use unionfs though, I don't
:>know.
:
:LINT contains the comment:
:# NB: The NULL, PORTAL, UMAP and UNION filesystems are known to be
:# buggy, and WILL panic your system if you attempt to do anything with
:# them. They are included here as an incentive for some enterprising
:# soul to sit down and fix them.
:
:This suggests that there are more serious problems that need fixing.
:
:Peter
Unionfs is somewhat useable but there are indeed still some serious
bugs remaining. I did a considerable amount of work on it last
year that fixes the more aggregious problems, but I still can't
buildworld/installworld using unionfs overlays without getting data
corruption. The main problem that unionfs suffers from is that
the VFS stack was not designed to support transparent overlays and
unionfs has to fake out the system to make it work, especially when it
comes to the VM system.
I think the getcwd() problem is worthy of a send-pr, but I don't know
anyone who is currently working on unionfs (and I probably will not have
any time to do so this year myself). It does sounds like it ought to be
relatively easy to fix considering how repeatable it is.
-Matt
Matthew Dillon
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
