On Thursday 04 November 2010 20:01:57 Matthew Fleming wrote: > On Thu, Nov 4, 2010 at 11:41 AM, Hans Petter Selasky <hsela...@c2i.net> wrote: > > On Thursday 04 November 2010 15:29:51 John Baldwin wrote: > >> (and there is in Jeff's OFED branch) > > > > Is there a link to this branch? I would certainly have a look at his work > > and re-base my patch. > > It's on svn.freebsd.org: > > http://svn.freebsd.org/viewvc/base/projects/ofed/head/sys/kern/subr_taskque > ue.c?view=log > http://svn.freebsd.org/viewvc/base?view=revision&revision=209422 > > For the purpose of speed, I'm not opposed to breaking the KBI by using > a doubly-linked TAILQ, but I don't think the difference will matter > all that often (perhaps I'm wrong and some taskqueues have dozens of > pending tasks?) > > Thanks, > matthew
At first look I see that I need a non-blocking version of: taskqueue_cancel( At the point in the code where these functions are called I cannot block. Is this impossible to implement? --HPS _______________________________________________ freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
