Sent from my iPad
On Oct 11, 2010, at 5:50 PM, John Baldwin <j...@freebsd.org> wrote: > On Tuesday, October 05, 2010 2:39:26 am Daichi GOTO wrote: >> Next step discussion engaged from this research I guess. >> >> Should we do change FreeBSD's fcntl(2) to return correct l_pid >> when called with F_SETLK? Or keep current behavior?? >> I want to hear other developers ideas and suggetions. > > POSIX doesn't say that F_SETLK returns a valid l_pid, so I think FreeBSD's > current behavior is fine. Yes, I agree. POSIX says so. > -- > John Baldwin _______________________________________________ freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
