On Monday 23 August 2010 10:57:40 Ian FREISLICH wrote: > Ian FREISLICH wrote: > > So, in this case is the fusefs module broken? I'm guessing it is. > > I don't like the way fuse_fileops is initialised in fuse4bsd. I > > would prefer for the struct to be zeroed and then the fo_xxx > > implimented bits set as appropriate. That way when the struct is > > changed, you don't get stung again. > > I am an idiot - that will have no effect. This patch needs to be > included in sysutils/fusefs-kmod/files
Would you file a PR with the patch accounting for the correct __FreeBSD_version__? Thanks, -- Anish Mistry
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
