On 01/-10/-28163 20:59, Doug Barton wrote:
3. kdepim4 My understanding is that the version currently under development has support for libassuan 2.0.0, and will be released in August. The kde@ folks have indicated that if there is a need to update it sooner they can most likely do that based on patches that are currently available.
[...]
> I am unsure what happens when some ports want v1 and others want v2. > This may not be an issue if the updated ports can be deal with either > API, but I have no idea whether that is the case. The current situation is that having both versions installed is incompatible. My preference would be that the maintainers of the affected ports upgrade to depend on assuan 2.0.0 and then we can remove libassuan-1. If it becomes necessary to support having both versions installed then "Plan C" at this point would be to modify libassuan-1 to support this.
I thought "Plan C" was a requirement -- and from your first mails, I thought this was planned.
deskutils/kdepim4 LIB_DEPENDS on libassuan-1 and gpgme. security/gpgme RUN_DEPENDS on gpg2. security/gnupg LIB_DEPENDS on assuan.0.
Hence, building deskutils/kdepim4, I need security/libassuan-1 and security/libassuan installed that list each other in CONFLICTS.
I have not actually tried to build deskutils/kdepim4 after the gnupg update, but is it not currently broken?
If that is correct, either kde@ has to patch deskutils/kdepim4 (which they do not plan from the discussion at that list) or you have to patch security/libassuan-1 (which you do not plan from your statement above). Will we have a deskutils/kdepim4 with 8.1-RELEASE?
Cheers, Jan Henrik _______________________________________________ freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
