On 5/29/10, Rui Paulo <rpa...@freebsd.org> wrote: > > On 29 May 2010, at 05:39, b. f. wrote: > >> On 5/28/10, Doug Barton <do...@freebsd.org> wrote: >>> On 5/28/2010 4:50 PM, b. f. wrote: >>>> >>>> I can't see any problems when using WPA2 with AES on r208606 i386 with >>>> uath(4). I'm updating this machine to r208630 tonight, and if I >>>> encounter problems with the later revision, I'll let you know. >>> >>> Ok, thanks. >>> >>>> Are >>>> you saying that you experienced problems when trying to use a r207134 >>>> base with a r208626 kernel? If that's the case, I would recommend >>>> updating the base to the same revision as the kernel, and then >>>> retesting. >>> >>> Yes, that's what I'm doing I actually tried running the newly built >>> wpa_supplicant but that didn't work. I'm kind of hesitant to do the full >>> upgrade since I'm having kernel problems with the nvidia driver, but if >>> I'm sure wpa_supplicant will work then I suppose I can bite the bullet. >>> >> >> It appears that something is wrong. My wireless stick no longer >> associates with the network with r208630. I'll do some tinkering. > > That's odd. The only way for that to happen would be caused bug in the > taskqueue stuff that zml committed, I think, but that's a long shot. > > Regards, > -- > Rui Paulo
Yes, that was also my suspicion, and after seeing, via top(1), that ifconfig is stuck in the "*taskq" state while attempting to set up the wlan, I believe either r208623, or r208624, or both, is responsible for the regression. b. _______________________________________________ freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
