On Sun, 16 May 1999, Narvi wrote:
> > On Sat, 15 May 1999, Alfred Perlstein wrote: > > > On Sat, 15 May 1999, Narvi wrote: > > > > > > > > On Fri, 14 May 1999, Garance A Drosehn wrote: > > > > > > > At 3:51 PM +0700 5/12/99, Ustimenko Semen wrote: > > > > > Are we going to get this license? I am interested in NTFS > > > > > source code a lot... > > > > > > > > I would be very careful about getting an NT source license if > > > > your intention is to write NTFS support for some other operating > > > > system. Microsoft is not doing this licensing for the benefit of > > > > mankind, they are doing it to attract college-type users to > > > > sticking with WinNT over open-source unixes. > > > > > > > > The last thing we need is some code from WinNT which causes us > > > > to be sued by Microsoft... > > > > > > > > > > It would probably be very unwise for the project to get get the licence. > > > > > > However, considering that we support loadable filesystem modules, somebody > > > adventurous enough can get the licence and write a (separate distributed, > > > possibly even only as binary) module. > > > > > > Downloading a kld module from the net definately does not "taint" your > > > mind. > > > > I'm unsure what the fuss is over, don't we have a kld to read NTFS already? > > > > How about writing? > Yes, there is no writing. The problem is that NTFS is ``Logging'' file system. Current documentation is totaly reverse developed, and it's very difficult to hack $LogFile... Anyway we have to read the license before discussing. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majord...@freebsd.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
