On Wed, 12 May 1999, Noriyuki Soda wrote:

> > > BTW, there are many fundamental design flaws in new-bus, so I don't
> > > think new-bus is comparable with newconfig, yet, even if priority
> > > probe is implemented. For example:
> > 
> > I'm not going to reply to these points as I suspect it will lead to a
> > pointless flame thread. I would prefer to discuss these issues in person
> > at Usenix.
> 
> I agree that this is better way to solve the conflicts between new-bus 
> and newconfig. Although I wondered why FreeBSD's core decide to choose 
> new-bus before Usenix.

As I suspected, a massive flamewar has happened while I've been away. I
don't think I have anything to add to what has been said (and I certainly
don't want to continue a flamewar).

Can people please just drop the subject until after Usenix. This kind of
flamewar is too upsetting (to me anyway) and just makes it harder to have
a useful face-to-face discussion.

--
Doug Rabson                             Mail:  d...@nlsystems.com
Nonlinear Systems Ltd.                  Phone: +44 181 442 9037




To Unsubscribe: send mail to majord...@freebsd.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message

Reply via email to