>phk> > Since newconfig appears technically superior, what are the issues >that >phk> >are hindering its acceptance? >phk> >phk> That we want to have no "config" at all. > >That is too short an answer.
No, it is complete and to the point. >What is the definition of "config"? config(8) >Why do you want to remove it? Why should we, as a 3rd millenium OS need a static config tool ? Tell me which future technology we will need to handle which will require static config ? We are working on FreeBSD as a OS for the future, not for the past. -- Poul-Henning Kamp FreeBSD coreteam member p...@freebsd.org "Real hackers run -current on their laptop." FreeBSD -- It will take a long time before progress goes too far! To Unsubscribe: send mail to majord...@freebsd.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message