>phk> >    Since newconfig appears technically superior, what are the issues 
>that
>phk> >are hindering its acceptance?
>phk> 
>phk> That we want to have no "config" at all.
>
>That is too short an answer.

No, it is complete and to the point.

>What is the definition of "config"?

        config(8)

>Why do you want to remove it?

Why should we, as a 3rd millenium OS need a static config tool ?

Tell me which future technology we will need to handle which will
require static config ?

We are working on FreeBSD as a OS for the future, not for the past.

--
Poul-Henning Kamp             FreeBSD coreteam member
p...@freebsd.org               "Real hackers run -current on their laptop."
FreeBSD -- It will take a long time before progress goes too far!


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majord...@freebsd.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message

Reply via email to