Alex Zepeda wrote:
>
> Which means that it perhaps should be worked out before being merged. Take
> for instance CAM. It didn't work perfectly, but it sure got a lot more
> exposure than newbus, and when it was integrated it caused very few
> problems.
I think CAM is a very bad example. We *still* don't have all the
drivers we had, and that includes at least one reasonably requested
driver.
On the other hand, I don't see we losing anything with newbus, which
is quite a feat given the extent of the changes. Moreover, I have
seen very few problems reported. Changing the compiler to egcs seems
to have produced more waves, in fact.
> Well, why not make ext2fs the default fs just to shake things up? It's
> one thing to expect panics and soon, but it's another thing to import code
> that wasn't ready.
It seems to work on my computer. Why do you say it isn't ready? A
reality check seems to be in order. It would seem you are peeved
because some of the very few gliches affected you.
--
Daniel C. Sobral (8-DCS)
d...@newsguy.com
d...@freebsd.org
"Well, Windows works, using a loose definition of 'works'..."
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majord...@freebsd.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
