In message <rd6btgozp8q....@world.std.com>, Lowell Gilbert writes: >Mikhail Teterin <m...@misha.cisco.com> writes: > >> Sorry. I'm just repeating what Ladavac Marino wrote in >> <55586e7391acd211b9730000c1100276179...@r-lmh-wi-100.corpnet.at>: >> >> LM: Please note that memory overcommit architectures are a >> LM: rather common optimization; FreeBSD is one of them. They >> LM: do, however, break the ISO/ANSI C conformance (strictly >> LM: speaking). >> >> Since there was no immediate (nor later) rebuttal, I assumed, that >> everyone quietly agreed... > >[...] Heck, the >*existence* of kill(1) and SIGKILL would be enough to make for a >non-conforming C environment.
See RFC 748 for more details. Please let this thread die now. -- Poul-Henning Kamp FreeBSD coreteam member p...@freebsd.org "Real hackers run -current on their laptop." FreeBSD -- It will take a long time before progress goes too far! To Unsubscribe: send mail to majord...@freebsd.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
