Quoth Brian Feldman on Wed, 14 April:
: 
: ACTUALLY it would still break ANSI because the malloc itself would crash
: the program, instead of touching the memory manually.

The point here is that malloc can return null when it fails to allocate.
I might mention that Andrew Reilly's suggestion is the winner so far,
in my mind.  The solution of having libc:malloc honor a 'setenv 
MALLOC_MMAP_STORE
/path/here' would work with shrink-wrap software, and completely
bypass the concerns, real and imagined, of even the most zealous 
advocate of overcommit purity.


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majord...@freebsd.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message

Reply via email to