On Mon, 22 Mar 1999, John Baldwin wrote:

> 
> On 22-Mar-99 Richard Wackerbarth wrote:
> > There is a problem with this approach.
> > 
> > /etc/defaults/rc.conf defines ${rc_conf_files}
> > However, I have no chance to override it before it is used.
> > 
> > However, I fear that you need a bit more logic to allow the
> > overriding of ${rc_conf_files}.
> 
> Where are going to override it?  If we use some other config file that gets
> sucked in to /etc/defaults/rc.conf we'd have a config file included in
> another config file that tells it what other config files to include.  If this
> keeps up we'll end up with a bunch of config files floating around that config
> other config files, which will end up messy and confusing for newbies, IMHO.

Unless someone comes up with a scheme that tracks set membership and
allows us to add to that set, I think that we should stick to the "simple"
approach.

/etc/defaults/rc.conf defines ${rc_conf_files} to be "/etc/rc.conf"

/etc/rc.conf is allowed to override this definition to include additional
files such as "/etc/rc.conf.local" 

Those files get sucked in.

- - -

An alternate, and perhaps cleaner approach would be to always suck in
/etc/defaults/rc.conf and /etc/rc.conf. Then suck in those files specified
in ${additional_rc_conf_files}.



To Unsubscribe: send mail to majord...@freebsd.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message

Reply via email to