On Mon, Feb 15, 1999 at 03:55:07AM +0900, takaw...@shidahara1.planet.sci.kobe-u.ac.jp wrote: > >>d2 found. > >I want to know about this address. SMBus in my motherboard will hang >up when I issue RECV_BYTE method for this port.
It does not for me. It's supposed to be the address of a clock chip, isn't it? > >>> BTW, as outlined by -pkh all this is just a first step in a huge monitoring >>> adventure where all still need to be _defined_ (architecture and interfaces) >>> and implemented. Any proposition for doing the job is wellcome, >>> since I just have enough time to do the hardware SMBus support. >> >>Sounds like fun.... > >I think so too. >/dev/smb? should not be used in casual use,because it is dangerous,as >banging I/O port.I want to discuss about the interface. Where did he >wrote it? He wrote nothing, just: >>> Not to stop you in your tracks, but I would really love to see somebody (more capable than the PAO people) work out a power management architecture for us before we have too many more hacks in this area... Poul-Henning In message <199902131808.kaa79...@freefall.freebsd.org>, Nicolas Souchu writes: >nsouch 1999/02/13 10:08:35 PST > > Modified files: > share/man/man4 intpm.4 > Log: > Fix the date and add an smbus declaration > > Revision Changes Path > 1.2 +3 -2 src/share/man/man4/intpm.4 > <<< -- nso...@teaser.fr / nso...@freebsd.org FreeBSD - Turning PCs into workstations - http://www.FreeBSD.org To Unsubscribe: send mail to majord...@freebsd.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
