On Thu, 11 Feb 1999 09:15:29 -0800
"Justin C. Walker" <jus...@apple.com> wrote:
> I can say that our implementation doesn't seem to =
> suffer from this problem. Could be there's an issue in the use of =
> PRUS_* v. the socket state we use. The code in my kernel looks like:
The NetBSD code looks pretty much just like this, and also does not
suffer from an mbuf cluster leak of any kind.
-- Jason R. Thorpe <thor...@nas.nasa.gov>
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majord...@freebsd.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
