On Thu, 28 Jan 1999, Leif Neland wrote:

> 
> 
> On Wed, 27 Jan 1999, Archie Cobbs wrote:
> 
> > Doug Rabson writes:
> > > And another thing.  Why can't we use a non-driver-specific name for the
> > > disk?  Most users simply don't care whether the driver was fd, wfd, wd or
> > > anything.  They just want to get to their files without any fuss.
> > 
> > I agree.. and same thing goes for Ethernet drivers. I actually
> > like the way Linux always has "eth0", "eth1", ... (which we could
> > do using netgraph, with some work).
> > 
> Just symlink eth0 to which card you like, just as /dev/mixer happens to be
> a symlink to /dev/mixer1 on my system.

Unfortunately network devices aren't represented in /dev on BSD systems.

--
Doug Rabson                             Mail:  d...@nlsystems.com
Nonlinear Systems Ltd.                  Phone: +44 181 442 9037



To Unsubscribe: send mail to majord...@freebsd.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message

Reply via email to