Garrett Wollman writes: > > Please do go ahead and update it.. the experts agree! > > I haven't seen any experts involved in this discussion yet. It's > probably after bedtime down there in oz.
It was discussed before a couple of weeks ago, and I didn't hear anybody on the other side. I could be mistaken though. Anyway, if we're going to -Wall'ify the kernel (as we should) then we need to update sytle(9) to reflect that. In fact, style(9) should say: If at all possible, your code should compile without warnings when the gcc -Wall flag is given. As it stands now (and I QUOTE!) it says: Don't use parentheses unless they're required for precedence, or the statement is really confusing without them. a = b->c[0] + ~d == (e || f) || g && h ? i : j >> 1; That's ridiculous! If you're telling me that line is not 'really confusing' then.. hell, I don't know what. I guess I just strongly disagree. -Archie ___________________________________________________________________________ Archie Cobbs * Whistle Communications, Inc. * http://www.whistle.com To Unsubscribe: send mail to majord...@freebsd.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message