In article <199901271944.laa15317.kithrup.freebsd.curr...@kithrup.com> you write: >>all over the kernel: >> >> suser(NOJAIL, bla, bla); >>or >> suser(0, bla, bla); >Oh, goody, more gratuitious incomaptibilities with everyone else.
And to followup to my own message, since nobody else has: This is stupid. While I don't object to the concept (and even know people who have requested it), that particular implementation sucks. It breaks an existing API *and* ABI. I would suggest using a different routine name than suser(); suser() can be made into a macro or stub routine that calls the new routine with a first argument of 0 (or, of course, both a macro *and* a stub routine). Any time there's a change, "all over the kernel," THIS SHOULD RAISE WARNING FLAGS, PEOPLE! To Unsubscribe: send mail to majord...@freebsd.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
