On Thu, Feb 10, 2000 at 08:24:09AM -0500, Donn Miller wrote:
> I know that the standard gcc-2.95.2 itself has libstdc++ built in, so
> there's no separate library there.
Huh??? Try this:
cd /usr/local/lib/gcc-lib
find . -name libstdc++.a
Don't confuse shared libs vs. static ones; with a total lack.
> What advantage do we gain by having libstdc++ separated out?
We don't.
--
-- David ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
- Re: gcc and /usr/lib/libstdc++.so.3 John Polstra
- Re: gcc and /usr/lib/libstdc++.so.3 Maxim Sobolev
- Re: gcc and /usr/lib/libstdc++.so.3 John Polstra
- Re: gcc and /usr/lib/libstdc++.so.3 Donn Miller
- Re: gcc and /usr/lib/libstdc++.so.3 Will Andrews
- Re: gcc and /usr/lib/libstdc++.so.3 Donn Miller
- Re: gcc and /usr/lib/libstdc++.so.3 Alex Zepeda
- Re: gcc and /usr/lib/libstdc++.so.3 Donn Miller
- Re: gcc and /usr/lib/libstdc++.so.3 Doug White
- Re: gcc and /usr/lib/libstdc++.so.3 David O'Brien
- Re: gcc and /usr/lib/libstdc++.so.3 David O'Brien
- Re: gcc and /usr/lib/libstdc++.so.3 Maxim Sobolev
- Re: gcc and /usr/lib/libstdc++.so.3 German Tischler
- Re: gcc and /usr/lib/libstdc++.so.3 Donn Miller
