On Fri, Feb 11, 2000 at 05:02:23PM -0600, Richard Wackerbarth wrote: > > If we were to have a stripped down skeleton of the ports, is it generally felt > that the INDEX contains enough information? If I were to extend portcheckout and to write a front-end for it, I would write v.1.0 that assumes the INDEX contains enough information and v.2.0 that fixes that initial broken assumption. -- Signature withheld by request of author. To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
- Re: /usr/ports/ too big? Donn Miller
- Re: /usr/ports/ too big? Matthew Dillon
- Re: /usr/ports/ too big? Jeffrey J. Mountin
- Re: /usr/ports/ too big? Matthew Dillon
- Re: /usr/ports/ too big? Jeffrey J. Mountin
- Re: /usr/ports/ too big? Matthew Dillon
- Re: /usr/ports/ too big? John Polstra
- Re: /usr/ports/ too big? Jeffrey J. Mountin
- Re: /usr/ports/ too big? Tim Vanderhoek
- Re: /usr/ports/ too big? Richard Wackerbarth
- Re: /usr/ports/ too big? Tim Vanderhoek
- Re: /usr/ports/ too big? David Scheidt
- Re: /usr/ports/ too big? Kris Kennaway
- Re: /usr/ports/ too big? Leif Neland
- Re: /usr/ports/ too big? John Polstra
- Re: /usr/ports/ too big? Udo Schweigert
- Re: /usr/ports/ too big? Szilveszter Adam
- Re: /usr/ports/ too big? Leif Neland
- Re: /usr/ports/ too big? Jeffrey J. Mountin
- Re: /usr/ports/ too big? Peter Jeremy
- Re: /usr/ports/ too big? Richard Wackerbarth