In message <Pine.BSF.4.20.0001231408180.4623-200000@localhost> Nick Hibma writes:
: The following patch fixes two things: First, DEVICE_SUSPEND errors are
: no longer ignored. Since we have defaults for methods we should no
: longer ignore these errors. Also, DEVICE_RESUME wasn't done when the
: apm_suspend_system event failed.
I had similar patches that workede several months ago, but they have
since been lost.
: Second, in the ordering of DEVICE_* and apm_hook_* is not symmetric for
: suspend and resume. The patch reverses the resume case as well to be
:
: apm_hook_resume(...)
: DEVICE_RESUME(root)
:
: Send me some feedback on this. I've mailed the people mentioned in the
: head of the file, but so far got no response. I would like to make sure
: we get this right when USB devices are used. Some of them don't suspend
: and the suspend should be refused in that case.
Any reason to not shoot the apm_hook_{suspend,resume} in the head and
just use newbus suspend/resume everywhere?
Warner
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
