In some email I received from Warner Losh, sie wrote: > > In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Josef Karthauser writes: > : My 3c589d works just fine now, along with suspend/resume :) (under 4.0). > > The issue with the 3c589d is with its speed. It is falling back to > the timeout routine to send data rather than getting an interrupt when > the tx has happened (or something like this, I'm reporting second hand > stuff). Whatever it is, results in ping times being 1000ms then 10ms then 1000ms then 10ms...when it responds. i.e. it's a mistake to use FreeBSD 3.x with the 3c589d. Darren To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
- Re: 4.0 code freeze scheduled for Jan 15th Garrett Wollman
- Re: 4.0 code freeze scheduled for Jan 15th Dave Cornejo
- Re: 4.0 code freeze scheduled for Jan 15th Jordan K. Hubbard
- Re: 4.0 code freeze scheduled for Jan 15th Frank Mayhar
- Re: 4.0 code freeze scheduled for Jan 15th Warner Losh
- Re: 4.0 code freeze scheduled for Jan 15th Darren Reed
- Re: 4.0 code freeze scheduled for Jan 15th Amancio Hasty
- Re: 4.0 code freeze scheduled for Jan 15th Josef Karthauser
- Re: 4.0 code freeze scheduled for Jan 15th Tom Bartol
- Re: 4.0 code freeze scheduled for Jan 15th Warner Losh
- Re: 4.0 code freeze scheduled for Jan 15th Darren Reed
- Re: 4.0 code freeze scheduled for Jan 15th sthaug
- 3c589d problem Mike Smith
- 3C589 problems (was: 4.0 code freeze scheduled for ... Greg Lehey
- Re: 3C589 problems (was: 4.0 code freeze scheduled ... Warner Losh
- Re: 3C589 problems (was: 4.0 code freeze scheduled ... Jonathan Chen
- Re: 3C589 problems (was: 4.0 code freeze scheduled ... Frank Mayhar
- Re: 3C589 problems (was: 4.0 code freeze scheduled ... Greg Lehey
- Re: 3C589 problems (was: 4.0 code freeze scheduled ... Frank Mayhar
- Re: 3C589 problems (was: 4.0 code freeze scheduled ... Matthew N. Dodd
- Re: 3C589 problems (was: 4.0 code freeze scheduled ... Will Andrews