On Sun, Jan 02, 2000 at 12:22:38PM +0100, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
> In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Karl Denninger writes:
>
> >> >Well... that won't help the 20 or so boxes here doing this all the
> >> >time:
> >> >Jan 1 11:26:46 gndrsh xntpd[133]: time reset (step) -0.217546 s
> >> >Jan 1 11:32:06 gndrsh xntpd[133]: time reset (step) 0.207523 s
> >>
> >> (-0.217546 - 0.207523) / (14 + 5 * 60 + 6) = -.001328340
> >>
> >> Your clock is too sick, (or our calibration of it is hosed), no
> >> version of {X}NTP will touch a clock which is outside +/- 500ppm.
> >>
> >> Could you try to measure the 14.31818... MHz base frequency and
> >> the 32768 kHz wristwatch xtal as well (I know you're RadioActive,
> >> so I pressume you have a counter ?)
> >>
> >> If they're both OK, then we have a code problem...
> >
> >You have a code problem ;-)
>
> If you have access to a frequency counter, could you try to make the
> same measurements please ?
I don't have one handy, BUT I saw this SAME problem across oh, 20 machines.
Every one. Every time.
And oh, by the way, when one of them (mine) was upgraded to the newest ntpd,
it *WENT AWAY*. Thus, I think its quite reasonable to say its not the clock
and must be the code (since the hardware could not have magically changed
:-)
> Do you have any refclocks we can use to measure against ?
Had one at MCS (Spectracom WWV receiver), but its there and I'm here. It
appears from their strata change (from 1 to 2; I chime off them) that they
turned it off. I should have taken it with me when I left :-)
BTW, speaking of which, does anyone know of a reasonably-cheap GPS receiver
that (1) has an external-able antenna that will work with somewhere between
50 and 100 feet of lead, and (2) has the appropriate pps outputs and such
so it can be used for this?
--
--
Karl Denninger ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) Web: http://childrens-justice.org
Isn't it time we started putting KIDS first? See the above URL for
a plan to do exactly that!
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
