Re: xntpd - VERY old folks, how about updating? :-)

[Karl Denninger]

On Sun, Jan 02, 2000 at 12:20:35PM +0100, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
> In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Karl Denninger writes:
> 
> >> >> Anyway, ntpd4 is in CURRENT...
> >> >
> >> >Now it is.  
> >> >
> >> >And it works correctly too.
> >> 
> >> In general yes, but not if you use the hardpps() with a refclock,
> >> it works better after I fixed a couple of almost-mutually-canceling
> >> sign-bugs, but the parameters of the hardpps() PLL relative to the
> >> FLL are wrong.
> >
> >You're still a bunch of revs back - the current is either "h" or "i", and it
> >has a bunch of fixes (including one here, I think)
> 
> No, the NTP distribution doesn't contain the kernel code, it only interfaces
> to it.

Well yes.... you're saying that the bug was *in* the kernel and not ntpd
then?  Ok..

> I'm sure Ollivier will upgrade us every so often now :-)

No problem.

--
-- 
Karl Denninger ([EMAIL PROTECTED])  Web: http://childrens-justice.org
Isn't it time we started putting KIDS first?  See the above URL for
a plan to do exactly that!



To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message