Donn Miller wrote in list.freebsd-current:
 > Actually, that's not a bad idea.  One idea I had was combining
 > syscons with XFree86 server code, so you always have a crippled X
 > server running without the bloat of a full-blown X server
 > running.

I'm afraid that wouldn't work.  In order to run non-trivial X11
apps, you _will_ need a full-blown X server, including X libs.
You'll also need at least a very simple window manager (while
xclock would probably work without, Netscape would certainly be
pretty unusable).  Although, the window manager would be the
smallest problem of your approach...

 > One potential drawback is that it would probably bloat the
 > syscons code slightly.

*ROTFL*  :-))

Regards
   Oliver

-- 
Oliver Fromme, Leibnizstr. 18/61, 38678 Clausthal, Germany
(Info: finger userinfo:[EMAIL PROTECTED])

"In jedem Stück Kohle wartet ein Diamant auf seine Geburt"
                                         (Terry Pratchett)


To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message

Reply via email to