Donn Miller wrote in list.freebsd-current:
> Actually, that's not a bad idea. One idea I had was combining
> syscons with XFree86 server code, so you always have a crippled X
> server running without the bloat of a full-blown X server
> running.
I'm afraid that wouldn't work. In order to run non-trivial X11
apps, you _will_ need a full-blown X server, including X libs.
You'll also need at least a very simple window manager (while
xclock would probably work without, Netscape would certainly be
pretty unusable). Although, the window manager would be the
smallest problem of your approach...
> One potential drawback is that it would probably bloat the
> syscons code slightly.
*ROTFL* :-))
Regards
Oliver
--
Oliver Fromme, Leibnizstr. 18/61, 38678 Clausthal, Germany
(Info: finger userinfo:[EMAIL PROTECTED])
"In jedem Stück Kohle wartet ein Diamant auf seine Geburt"
(Terry Pratchett)
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message