In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Theo PAGTZIS writes:
: In that sense I would recommend some change in the naming (or rather
: numbering) convention which in my book should be
:
: 3.2-RELEASE -> 3.3-STABLE -> 3.3-RC -> 3.3-RELEASE -> 3.4-STABLE
:
: and NOT
:
: 3.2-RELEASE -> 3.2-STABLE -> 3.3-RC -> 3.3-RELEASE -> 3.3-STABLE
I don't follow your logic. What we have works and the -FOO meanings
are a) arbitrary in a vacuum and b) well defined in FreeBSD. There is
no point in changing them.
3.4 doesn't exist until 3.4-release happens. Naming things 3.4 stable
just after 3.3 release would be too confusing. The -RC stuff is just
for a few days, so doesn't cause much confusion since it is Really
Close to 3.4.
Warner
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
