On Fri, 29 Oct 1999, Doug White wrote:

> On Fri, 29 Oct 1999, Ben Rosengart wrote:
> 
> > On Fri, 29 Oct 1999, Doug White wrote:
> > 
> > > I still hate the way the signal change was handled. 
> > 
> > How would you have done it differently?  As I understand it, the pain
> > was more or less inevitable.
> 
> Perhaps, but there must be a way to keep gcc from dying.  
> 
> I don't fully understand the mechanics involved so I will shut up until I
> teach myself about the syscall handling and concoct a better solution :)

Since there were syscalls added, the newly compiled gcc calls 
system calls in the kernel that don't exist... _yet_

I like the idea of some sort of date/version checking, but
it's not being checked just yet.

-Alfred



To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message

Reply via email to