On Sat, 2 Oct 1999, David O'Brien wrote:

> > > P.S.  This also reminds me that FreeBSD is non-standard relative
> > > to Linux and all of the major vender commercial Unices in that a disallowed
> > > access, such as a write to a read-only region of memory, generates
> > > a SIGBUS rather than a SIGSEGV.
> > 
> > Yes, this even violates the 1996 POSIX spec.
> 
> So lets make the change for 4.0. :-)
> 
> Just how much code will break?
> 

All that has been changed during porting to catch the other signal?

And what will we be issuing sigbus for?

> -- 
> -- David    ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
> 
> 
> To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
> 



To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message

Reply via email to