On Wed, 29 Sep 1999, Harold Gutch wrote: > I interpreted the way of currently handling things (build the > kernel first, then the userland) to be a _temporary_ solution, > that Marcel was working on being fixed. If this is not the case, > then I agree with you. If I understand correctly, it only needs to be done once per system, but it makes no difference whether it happens on a given system now or six months from now. -- Ben Rosengart UNIX Systems Engineer, Skunk Group StarMedia Network, Inc. To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
- Re: HEADS UP: sigset_t changes committed John Polstra
- Re: HEADS UP: sigset_t changes committed John Polstra
- Re: HEADS UP: sigset_t changes committed Wilko Bulte
- Re: HEADS UP: sigset_t changes committed John Polstra
- Re: HEADS UP: sigset_t changes committed Doug
- Re: HEADS UP: sigset_t changes committed Marcel Moolenaar
- No Subject alanr
- Re: HEADS UP: sigset_t changes committed Harold Gutch
- Re: HEADS UP: sigset_t changes committed Doug
- Re: HEADS UP: sigset_t changes committed Harold Gutch
- Re: HEADS UP: sigset_t changes committed Ben Rosengart
- Re: HEADS UP: sigset_t changes comm... Doug
- Re: HEADS UP: sigset_t changes ... Harold Gutch
- Re: HEADS UP: sigset_t changes ... Doug
- Re: HEADS UP: sigset_t changes ... Rodney W. Grimes
- Re: HEADS UP: sigset_t changes ... Garrett Wollman
- Re: HEADS UP: sigset_t changes ... John-Mark Gurney
- Re: HEADS UP: sigset_t changes ... Jeremy Lea
- Re: HEADS UP: sigset_t changes ... Marcel Moolenaar
- Re: HEADS UP: sigset_t changes ... John-Mark Gurney
- Re: HEADS UP: sigset_t changes ... Marcel Moolenaar