[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > But specifying something too high (-O99) doesn't hurt - I'm using -O6 for > gcc 2.95.1 (which, by the way, compiles almost everything in 3.3-RELEASE > and 4.0-CURRENT, the only thing still troubling me with it is the kernel). The point is that it _does_ hurt. Anything above -O3 is _likely_ to have bugs. -- Daniel C. Sobral (8-DCS) [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] "Thus, over the years my wife and I have physically diverged. While I have zoomed toward a crusty middle-age, she has instead clung doggedly to the sweet bloom of youth. Naturally I think this unfair. Yet, if it was the other way around, I confess I wouldn't be happy either." To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
- Re: gcc optimizer in -cu... Zach N. Heilig
- Re: gcc optimizer in -current system ... The Hermit Hacker
- Re: gcc optimizer in -current system ... Kris Kennaway
- Re: gcc optimizer in -current system ... Matthew Dillon
- Re: gcc optimizer in -current system ... bsd
- Re: gcc optimizer in -current system ... Dan Nelson
- Re: gcc optimizer in -current system ... bsd
- Re: gcc optimizer in -current system ... Matthew Dillon
- Re: gcc optimizer in -current system ... Daniel C. Sobral
- Re: gcc optimizer in -current sys... Stephan van Beerschoten
- Re: gcc optimizer in -current sys... Garrett Wollman
- Re: gcc optimizer in -current system ... Ville-Pertti Keinonen
- Re: gcc optimizer in -current system ... Oliver Fromme
- Re: gcc optimizer in -current system ... Ville-Pertti Keinonen
- Re: gcc optimizer in -current system ... Oliver Fromme
- Re: gcc optimizer in -current system ... Oliver Fromme