> Noone compiles without -O, so(/and) it's not supported. My take is
> that EGCS says "Hey, I am in optimization level foobar! I can optimize
> for unused code. Hmm... that's unused, so...". Either that or its
> debugging support is really uNFed up.
Actually, more likely at high enough optimization levels, syscall is an
internal. At low levels, it would have to be an actual function. No such
function exists.
DS
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
- Still kernel compilation failures Thomas Schuerger
- Re: Still kernel compilation failures Brian F. Feldman
- Re: Still kernel compilation failures Thomas Schuerger
- Re: Still kernel compilation failures Brian F. Feldman
- Re: Still kernel compilation failures David Schwartz
- Re: Still kernel compilation failures Bruce Evans
- Re: Still kernel compilation failures Brian F. Feldman
- Re: Still kernel compilation failures Bob Bishop
- Re: Still kernel compilation failures Bruce Evans
- Re: Still kernel compilation failures Bruce Evans
