On Mon, 12 Jul 1999, Alex Zepeda wrote:
> On Mon, 12 Jul 1999, Brian F. Feldman wrote:
>
> > Why shouldn't we? Noone uses machines without FPUs anymore. What
> > non-ancient CPU doesn't have an FPU? And we're talking about the i386
> > family here...
>
> I've noticed recently, more and more, Linux is moving into the embedded
> market quite nicely, and being used on smaller and smaller systems.
> FreeBSD OTOH has been focusing (albeit not too successfully) on the higher
> end market.
>
> With my recent addition of an 040 powered Mac that I plan to put NetBSD
> on, this really irks me. I'd love to put some (read: a significant)
> amount of time getting FreeBSD up and running on this, but there seems to
> be a lot of resistance to using FreeBSD on smaller/older machines. It
> almost seems like the requirement is Pentium III, Alpha or bust.
>
> And yes, this machine does have an FPU, but there are plenty of *newer*
> systems without FPUs For instance, doesn't the StrongArm lack an FPU? What
> about embedded systems? A 486SX would draw a whole lot less power than a
> Pentium. And it's certainly not like emulating an FPU is an impossible
> task like say on some LC040s...
Compare the 486SX to a 486DX, not a pentium.
>
> - alex
>
>
Brian Fundakowski Feldman _ __ ___ ____ ___ ___ ___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ __ ___ | _ ) __| \
FreeBSD: The Power to Serve! _ __ | _ \._ \ |) |
http://www.FreeBSD.org/ _ |___/___/___/
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
