Mike Haertel once wrote: > Anyway, taking all that into account, I still agree with Dillon that > it is a better software solution to allow the same loadable drivers to > work for both UP and MP systems whenever possible. What's wrong, again with /modules and /modules.smp? If some third party only wants to provide ONE module, they can provide the smp one, right? The open-source ones, should be compileable one way or the other. The new hardware is so much faster for the benefit of applications, not the kernel :) -mi (without plans to retire his 486 and P90 anytime soon) To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
- Re: "objtrm" problem probably found (was Re: S... Oliver Fromme
- Re: "objtrm" problem probably found (was Re: S... Luoqi Chen
- Re: "objtrm" problem probably found (was ... Matthew Dillon
- Re: "objtrm" problem probably found (... Poul-Henning Kamp
- Re: "objtrm" problem probably fou... Matthew Dillon
- Re: "objtrm" problem probably fou... Matthew Dillon
- Re: "objtrm" problem probably found (... John-Mark Gurney
- Re: "objtrm" problem probably fou... Matthew Dillon
- Re: "objtrm" problem probably fou... Poul-Henning Kamp
- Re: "objtrm" problem probably found (... Mike Haertel
- Re: "objtrm" problem probably fou... Mikhail Teterin
- Re: "objtrm" problem probably fou... Mike Smith
- Re: "objtrm" problem probably... Matthew Dillon
- Re: "objtrm" problem pro... Mike Smith
- Re: "objtrm" problem... Matthew Dillon
- Re: "objtrm" problem pro... Peter Jeremy
- Re: "objtrm" problem... Matthew Dillon
- Re: "objtrm" problem... Peter Jeremy
- Re: "objtrm" problem probably... Peter Jeremy
- Re: "objtrm" problem pro... Matthew Dillon
- Re: "objtrm" problem... Matthew Dillon