On Fri, 2 Jul 1999, Matthew Jacob wrote:

> 
> 
> Let me add to this:
> > opinion:
> > 
> > If it's really blocking folks because things don't compile, it is always
> > acceptable to do what you need to do- the tree should always compile even
> > if -current. If the system doesn't boot because of change, then that's an
> > obvious one too. If things work differently or not as well, but things
> > are more or less working, it's not an emergency, so leave it for the
> > author to fix....
> 
> ...always modulo a short delay (call it a couple of hours) after reporting
> the problem... after all, you don't *know* that the update isn't finished
> and that other things are coming down the pipe... but a couple of hours
> leaves really the most reasonable time for an integration to complete and
> the author to have had lunch in between.
> 

I worded my original post wrong; my change did fix world. Your second point
(the "wait and see" approach) wouldn't apply in this case: Greg was asleep,
and world was broken.


 Brian Fundakowski Feldman      _ __ ___ ____  ___ ___ ___  
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]                   _ __ ___ | _ ) __|   \ 
     FreeBSD: The Power to Serve!        _ __ | _ \._ \ |) |
       http://www.FreeBSD.org/              _ |___/___/___/ 



To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message

Reply via email to