[ I've dropped [EMAIL PROTECTED] based on a request from Theo since he cannot post back to some of these lists. ] >Why have splr semantics? That is, it raises to splsoftclock if current >priority is lower, else doesn't fiddle with it. This is what I meant to suggest, but if this is not doable, create a new spl. -- Justin To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
- Changing the semantics of splsoftclock() Anonymous
- Re: Changing the semantics of splsoftclock() Anonymous
- Re: Changing the semantics of splsoftclock() Anonymous
- Changing the semantics of splsoftclock() Anonymous
- Re: Changing the semantics of splsoftclock() Bruce Evans
- Re: Changing the semantics of splsoftclock... Matthew Jacob
- Re: Changing the semantics of splsoftclock... Peter Wemm
- Re: Changing the semantics of splsoftc... Jeroen Ruigrok/Asmodai