On Mon, Aug 22, 2016 at 03:50:29PM +0930, Wayne Sierke wrote: > On Sat, 2016-08-20 at 21:58 +0300, Arto Pekkanen wrote: > > You are so AWESOME!!! :) Thank you very much for your efforts! > > > > There was a paid bounty posted for solving this problem, did anybody > > claim it yet? > > > > Also, I want to ask a dumb question (since I am not a dev): was the > > reason for "Aw snap!" tab crashes because of the difference in > > behavior > > of mmap() between Linux and FreeBSD? If not, what was the actual > > reason > > for this problem? I mean these problems did not manifest in Linux, > > so > > this whole issue was really arcane :S > > > > clutton kirjoitti 18.08.2016 05:29: > > > > > > On Thu, 2016-08-18 at 05:09 +0300, clutton wrote: > > > > > > > > I've just fixed the Aw, snap. I believe so. > > > > > > > > The patch is going to be huge, not because of this simple bug. > > > > New > > > > version was ported as well with some extra things. I need few > > > > more > > > > days > > > > to polish everything and create patches for some things that are > > > > to > > > > ugly now. And probably few days more to be sure that it works > > > > everywhere 9, 10, HEAD. The current porting was done on HEAD. > > > I see. 52 was already ported. I actually asked on this maillist, If > > > anyone working on this? It's bad when the same work done twice. > > > > > > From my liaskos/freebsd-chromium reply::: > > > Oh, I did my own porting as well. My first working version were > > > done a > > > week ago but real fixing 'Aw, snap' were done just now. Such a pity > > > that we both did the work. I spend endless time with lldb. I also > > > ported tools/gn/bootstrap and a lot of other stuff were polished. > > Unfortunately while the current pkg: > > chromium-52.0.2743.116 www/chromium > > appears to have eliminated the "Aw, snap!" behaviour, pages now just > stall quietly, becoming unresponsive. Stopping the page loading and > refreshing the page doesn't recover and the stalled tab has to be > closed and re-opened. > > From a UE perspective the "Aw, snap!" behaviour was actually better > since it at least provided a definite indicator of failure and (in my > case at least) failed "Aw, snap!" pages were recoverable with just a > refresh - albeit of late the "Aw, snap!" was tending to recur more > frequently on refreshes than I had noticed with earlier versions of > chromium.
Same here. Hanging pages, no more "Aw, snap!" messages.
pgpzbH0nkz3ZR.pgp
Description: PGP signature
