On 11/04/18 19:13, Les Kitchen wrote: > Oh, appropriate to this list: One question I'm tussling with is > what licences to use. The original author doesn't say what > licence his code and initial setup is under. > Since it's on > github, I assume it's some sort of free licence, but which one?
Hakyll is under a 3 clause BSD licence. https://github.com/jaspervdj/hakyll/blob/master/LICENSE > And for my stuff, it's going to be a combination of writing, for > which some sort of suitable Creative Commons licence would make > sense (by "suitable" I mean GPL-like), and code, for which I'm > thinking maybe Apache-2 would make most sense, since the amount > of code will be pretty small, and maybe not worth the overhead > of GPL. Any opinions? I'm not quite sure what you mean by 'overhead' of the GPL? If you plan to make source publicly available and reference/include the appropriate licence, then you've already there. The content on the site would be considered separate from the code, and would not be covered by the same copyright. Each article would be an original work, and you could use a licence such as CC BY-SA (which is perhaps the most GPL-like). regards, Glenn -- pgp: 833A 67F6 1966 EF5F 7AF1 DFF6 75B7 5621 6D65 6D65 _______________________________________________ Free-software-melb mailing list [email protected] https://lists.softwarefreedom.com.au/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/free-software-melb Free Software Melbourne home page: http://www.freesoftware.asn.au/melb/
