On Thu, 18 Dec 2014, "Noah O'Donoghue" <[email protected]> wrote: > > Actually Android wins handily when you start looking at such things. If > > you > > want a device that's smaller, larger, lighter, cheaper, or has a longer > > battery life then there's an Android device that wins. Apple makes a > > very small range of devices. > > Citation needed. Show me a small, light, android tablet with decent battery > life including standby power. Apple make a small range of devices, but they
No citation needed at all. Choose a category and if there is a wide range of devices to choose from (such as the range of Android devices) then one of them will win. There are many engineering trade-offs for things such as battery life vs weight, more expensive products can improve the possibilities regarding the combination of weight and battery life but there's always a trade-off. There is currentl no iPad smaller than 7.9 inches diagonal, no iPad with a screen resolution greater than 2048*1536 or size greater than 9.7 inches. -- My Main Blog http://etbe.coker.com.au/ My Documents Blog http://doc.coker.com.au/ _______________________________________________ Free-software-melb mailing list [email protected] http://lists.softwarefreedom.com.au/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/free-software-melb Free Software Melbourne home page: http://www.freesoftware.asn.au/melb/
