On 13 August 2013 10:39, Aníbal Monsalve Salazar <[email protected]> wrote:
> And not only that. If caff is used, the gpg signauture will be sent > encrypted and the owner of the email address has to have the secret key > to open the encrypted signature. > Good point. For that matter, would anyone here object to signing the following key for me? If so, why? If not, why not? Brian Mays <[email protected]> Do a Google search, if lucky you may find that I use to be responsible for PCMCIA in Debian, but run out of time, so now other people have taken over. Yes, I am definitely a Debian developer too. That email address is a valid email address too (Google can prove this). Most people signing wouldn't bother checking details like this with Google. -- Brian May <[email protected]> _______________________________________________ Free-software-melb mailing list [email protected] http://lists.softwarefreedom.com.au/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/free-software-melb Free Software Melbourne home page: http://www.freesoftware.asn.au/melb/
