Francisco, Ceciia, others, I decided to trace my steps back to what led to my interest in the late Hannah Frank's "Frame by Frame: A Materialist Aesthetics of Animated Cartoons". It was J. Hoberman's review in Artforum, Sept 2019, which I read in print and to which I don't have access online though it's here if you do:
https://www.artforum.com/print/201907/j-hoberman-on-hannah-frank-s-frame-by-frame-a-materialist-aesthetics-of-animated-cartoons-80518 Turns out her book's available for free in several download formats. https://luminosoa.org/site/books/m/10.1525/luminos.65/ I am going to try and read through it in the next couple of weeks so if anyone's interested in discussing it, please be in touch. Eric On Sun, Aug 16, 2020 at 11:03 Francisco Torres <[email protected]> wrote: > when i was in film school it used to bother me that in most film > > theory books animation was not even mentioned, as if it did not exist > > or as if it was not part of cinema at all. then i thought that all of > > cinema is animation, the camera breaks down the image into frames, > > then the projector screens it giving the illusion of continuity. so > > all film theory is abour animation. > > _______________________________________________ > > FrameWorks mailing list > > [email protected] > > https://mailman-mail5.webfaction.com/listinfo/frameworks > >
_______________________________________________ FrameWorks mailing list [email protected] https://mailman-mail5.webfaction.com/listinfo/frameworks
