On 12/22/2010 15:09, PRASANTH RAJAGOPAL wrote: > I procured a URU4000B and tested fprint & fprint_demo and they seems > to work fine. However, I need to do some evaluations, because for some > people and some fingers, it returns no match. This score could be > around 20. At the same time, 90% of unmatched scores are less than 10 > so I am more concerned about False nonmatching errors. The fingerprint sensor built into my laptop is a UPEK TouchStrip Sensor (TCS4C). Fingerprint matching is done by software (via NBIS, included in libfprint). Sometimes I need to swipe several times before getting a correct match (usually with a score between 45 and 50). > When I run the GUI from neurotechnology, the performance is far better > to the same device! [...] Should I suspect the matching capabilities > of bozorth? What are your experiences? libfprint does not have really advanced image processing algorithms, I guess this is why you get better results with Neurotechnology SDK. > Do I expect better result from UPEK EIkon? UPEK Eikon 2 uses hardware fingerprint matching AFAIK, it should give you the same results as the ones you can get from Windows driver.
Regards. -- Hugo Grostabussiat _______________________________________________ fprint mailing list [email protected] http://lists.reactivated.net/mailman/listinfo/fprint
