On Sat, Mar 31, 2012 at 11:40 PM, Thomas Dalton <[email protected]> wrote: > On 31 March 2012 22:33, Federico Leva (Nemo) <[email protected]> wrote: >> P.s.: It's a bit weird to focus so much on the reasons to oppose; why should >> opposing be justified /more/ than supporting? > > There's supposed to be a Q&A coming that will explain the supports.
That's true! Soon -- in a couple of days (everyone is traveling today/tomorrow so it's hard to review quickly). I'll send a note when we get it done, of course. In the meantime, if there are any questions for us (as a board) or for individual trustees I encourage you simply to send those along, either to me (if you want them to go to the whole board, as I will pass them along) or privately. That would help make sure that we can address the questions people actually have, rather than speculating. It sounds like people are interested in individual trustee motives. I do think it's better if trustees individually write/talk about where they are coming from, rather than trying to put that information in an official document like the minutes, where everything is condensed and there is the possibility of misrepresentation. Nemo, thanks for sending around the notes -- that's quite helpful! I think we have some notes that Joslyn took too, I'll see if there is anything I can add from that (though etherpad still doesn't seem to work well in my browser - boo.) -- phoebe _______________________________________________ foundation-l mailing list [email protected] Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
