Hi Jerry!
Am 14.12.25 um 23:56 schrieb Jerry D:
Hi all,
See attached patch and change log below.
Took we a while to sort this one out. Ultimately, my fix for PR105361
was wrong and we were calling hit_eof in the wrong place for the wrong
reasons. This is also a regression because the new testcase passes on 14
and fails on 15.
Regression tested on x86_64_linux_gnu.
OK for mainline? Then backport to 15 after some burn in.
Regards,
Jerry
commit f3df5d8f6b775f24b6090840a1b604d1582f875a
Author: Jerry DeLisle <[email protected]>
Date: Sun Dec 14 13:23:36 2025 -0800
Fortran: Fix bad read involving extra input text.
The problem here involved DTIO mixed with non-DTIO
variables in list formatted reads. The previous fix to
PR105361 broke the test case here by mis-handling the
end of file conditions. It was found that the code could
be significantly reduced as well.
PR libfortran/122936
libgfortran/ChangeLog:
* io/list_read.c (finish_list_read): Remove the use of hit_eof
and free_line. Simplify the logic. Add comments to clarify.
gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:
* gfortran.dg/pr122936.f90: New test.
Yes, this is OK for mainline and backport.
Thanks for the patch!
Harald
